Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2002No. 01-16772; D.C. No. CV-01-00294-WHAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Maria Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The district court held that there was no coverage under the State Farm policy issued to Mallory Shure.

Shure had rented the car involved in the accident and loaned it to the driver, Paul Roach. The rental contract stated that no other drivers were permitted. Ramirez was injured when Roach struck her with the rental car and she obtained a default judgment against him. Ramirez then sued State Farm in an attempt to recover the judgment.

Ramirez first contends that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paul BAKER; Heidi Baker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API