Legal Opinion

Amoco Production Co. v. Newton Sheep Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1996No. Nos. 94-4242, 95-4169PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

The first of these cases began as a suit by Amoco Production Company (Amoco) to quiet title to oil and gas in certain lands in Summit County, Utah. The defendants in that action were originally the United States and its lessees, who claimed title to one-half of the oil and gas, and the Newton Sheep Company (the Newtons), a Utah family limited partnership, and its grantees, who claimed title to all of the oil and gas. In addition, there was a related dispute between the Newtons and Bass Enterprises Production Co., one of the Newtons’ grantees, over title to one-half of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Murphy Oil Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Neer v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Video Training Source, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
  4. Keeter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1997
  5. MORENO-GUTIERREZ v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API