State v. Trice

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. TRICE 183 Cite as

286 Neb. 183

and concluding that based upon the results of that investiga- tion—information which Keyser was aware of at the time of his plea—Keyser would not have rejected the plea agreement offered to him. Keyser’s final assignment of error is with- out merit. CONCLUSION The order of the district court denying Keyser’s motion for postconviction relief is affirmed. Affirmed. Connolly and McCormack, JJ., participating on briefs. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. De’Aris R. Trice, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed July 5, 2013. No. S-12-126. 1.…