Legal Opinion

Droste v. City of Highland Park

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 3, Calendar No. 36,058PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This bill was filed to secure the reformation of a deed on the ground of mutual mis take. On the hearing, a decree was granted to the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed. The testi- ■ many tends to establish the following facts: •

In 1914, the village (now city) of Highland Park was constructing a water supply main from Lake St. Clair. It desired to run the main through a small strip of land belonging to the plaintiff and her husband, Joseph Droste, now deceased. The Drostes refused to grant a right of way. The Gratiot Highlands Company owned a subdivision on the other side of Gratiot avenue…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adams v. Iowa Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Emery v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Graham County Electric Cooperaiive, Inc. v. Town of SaffordArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Township of Royal Oak v. City of FerndaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API