Legal Opinion

People v. Sumner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1898Published

Appeal from a judgment convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, and also from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtPatterson, J.

The real question involved in “this appeal relates to the sufficiency of the proof to sustain the indictment. The appellant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny in-the first degree, upon an indictment containing two counts. On the trial the second count was withdrawn, and the case then stood upon one which charged a larceny in these words:

“ That said Perrin H. Sumner, late of the city and county of New York aforesaid, on the 16th day of July, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-six, at the city and county aforesaid, with force and arms, the sum of one thousand…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. . DumarNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Loomis v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Smith v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. People v. . LaurenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. People v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API