Legal Opinion

Lopes v. Vieira

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 1, 2010No. CV-F-06-1243 OWW/SMSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DISCOVERY AND FOR SANCTIONS (Doc. 104), DENYING DEFENDANT DOWNEY BRAND’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (Doc. 106), AND DENYING DEFENDANT DOWNEY BRAND’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF VALLEY GOLD LLC ON THE ISSUE OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE (Doc. 96)

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

On August 3, 2009, Plaintiffs moved to compel defendant Downey Brand LLP (“Downey Brand”) to produce (1) all billing records and/or invoices related to Valley Gold, LLC (“Valley Gold”) or…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Red Vision Systems, Inc. v. National Real Estate Information Services, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. r & Fellman, PC v. Affiniti Colorado, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. In re Lifetrade LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API