Malevitis v. Friedman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis
Plaintiff, John L. Malevitis, filed an action to recover damages from defendants, Albert Brooks Friedman and Albert Brooks Friedman, Ltd., for alleged defamation and false light invasion of privacy. The trial court granted Friedman’s motion to dismiss the complaint, finding that the statements were made during the course of a judicial proceeding and were therefore absolutely privileged. The issue on appeal is whether the statements were sufficiently related to the judicial proceedings to subject them to the absolute privilege doctrine. For the following reasons, we affirm.
The alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lykowski v. BergmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Libco Corp. v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Barakat v. MatzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Skopp v. First Federal SavingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Harris v. News-SunAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Novoselsky v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Medow v. FlavinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Grundhoefer v. SorinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Hartlep v. TorresAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Grundhoefer v. SorinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.