Legal Opinion

Pridgen v. James

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1929No. 7219PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. The evidence authorized the finding that the facts alleged in the petition were true.

2. The Penal Code (1910), § 1314, provides: “If a person is detained upon a criminal charge, and the solicitor-general is in the county, he shall be notified of the hearing; if not, the notice shall bo given to the prosecutor.” Compliance with this provision is not jurisdictional, and failure to raise the objection until after judgment amounts to a waiver. The warden, who held petitioner in custody, was duly served.

3. Where the clerk or the sheriff whose duty it is to receive or collect fines imposed upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. MizeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Long v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Baker v. WyattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Boatright v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Huffman v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Huffman v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API