Legal Opinion

General Contracting Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 9, 1939No. 42796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice

Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation. March 27, 1931, plaintiff entered into the contract involved in this case. The contract obligated the plaintiff to furnish all labor and materials and perform the work essential to construct for -the United States a lock in the Kanawha River, opposite Marmet, in the State of West Virginia.

This suit is for the recovery of stated sums alleged to be •due the plaintiff for performing work which the contract -did not provide it should perform. Ten separate items are involved, and each exacts a discussion. Work under the -contract and on the premises was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  3. Archie and Allan Spiers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  5. Flippin Materials Company, a Joint Venture Composed of Brown and Root, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API