Legal Opinion

Goodrich Silvertown Stores of B. F. Goodrich Co. v. F. M. Rugg Motor Sales Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1940No. 27820PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The question presented is whether a seller of tires and tubes, who reserves title thereto under a conditional sale contract duly deposited with the county recorder in accordance with Section 8568, General Code, may maintain an action for conversion against a mortgagee who, by virtue of a prior chattel mortgage lien on the automobile, on which these tires and tubes were placed at the time of sale, takes possession of the automobile with those accessories there on and subjects the vehicle thus equipped to the payment of the mortgage indebtedness.

This subject is usually treated in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franklin Service Stations, Inc. v. Sterling Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
  2. Goodrich Silvertown Stores v. Pratt Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. K. C. Tire Co. v. Way Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Goodrich Silvertown Stores of the B. F. Goodrich Co. v. A. & A. Credit System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Goodrich Silvertown, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cummings Bank Co. v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API