Legal Opinion

Freund v. Aiken Petroleum Co.

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided April 5, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 5653PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, District Judge.

This matter came before me upon defendant’s motion for an order transferring the cause from the Charleston Division to the Aiken Division of this Court, on the ground “that the defendant has its principal and only office and place -of business in Aiken County, South Carolina, within the geographical limits of the Aiken Division * * * ” of this Court.

It is admitted that the defendant is a corporation chartered and therefore domiciled in the State of South Carolina with its primary place of business located in Aiken, South Carolina, and that it was doing business in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. London v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. Reeder v. Corpus Christi Refining Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guy F. Atkinson Company v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958
  2. Denke v. Galveston, Houston & Henderson Railroad Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
  3. Henderson v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API