Legal Opinion

Prochot v. Drew

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 23, 1960No. Nos. 12989, 12990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Walter Prochot and Esther Prochot brought this diversity action for damages alleged to have been suffered arising out of their purchase of a tract of land from joint tenants Melvin Drew and his wife, Elizabeth Foerster Drew. Melvin Drew died after the contract of sale was drawn but prior to the execution of the deed. United Farm Agency (United) acted as broker in the sale for the Drews. Mrs. Drew and June Martino, the Drews’ daughter, were joint owners of a purchase money mortgage on the premises in question, taken from plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs’ complaint asked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bucher v. KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Vukelic v. Upper Third Street Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Young v. Baker, Fentress & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kenneth Lehrman v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Ag-Chem Equipment Co., Inc. v. Hahn, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
  3. Prochot v. DrewCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API