Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 31, 1983No. 05-82-00054-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of rape of a child younger than seventeen years for which appellant was assessed a sentence of ninety-nine years. In his first ground of error, appellant argues that the evidence in the trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict because the complaining witness failed to inform anyone of the offense charged within six months of its occurrence and because there was no other evidence which corroborated her testimony, in violation of Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 38.07 (Vernon 1979). We agree. Accordingly, we reverse.

First we must…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Hindman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Nemecek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Hill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  3. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API