Legal Opinion
State v. Moorehead
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1994No. Nos. 63665, 64939PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal. Defendant directly appeals his conviction for sale of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.211, RSMo 1986. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction review without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him. Therefore, only a brief description of the facts is necessary. On June 29, 1992, at approximately 4:50 p.m., Detective Thomas Llewellyn was working undercover for the City of St. Louis Police Department, attempting to engage people in known…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State v. HubbardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. PlummerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SumlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Tomas G. Ervin v. Paul K. Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center Michaelbowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- State v. MadewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. McGinnessMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. LoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.