Legal Opinion

Fonte v. Dickinson

Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

Decided December 3, 1990No. Case No. 89-3737Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GUY W. SPICOLA, Circuit Judge.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION

THIS MATTER came before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Motion and Plaintiffs’ Motion for New Trial and Supplemental Motion. The court has reviewed its files and the memoranda of counsel, has conducted its own research, and is *123otherwise fully advised in the premises. This Order will first address the court’s findings in regard to Defendant’s Motion to Strike and then will address Plaintiffs’ Motions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. City of Hollywood v. JarkesyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Yacker v. TeitchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. LaFleur v. Castlewood International Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Seaboard Coastline Railroad v. DennardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API