Legal Opinion

Dorn v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 3, 2016No. Appellate Case No. 2015-000659; Opinion No. 5432PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KONDUROS, J.:

Daniel Bernard Dorn and E.D., R.D., and Y.D. (collectively, Appellants) appeal the circuit court’s order dismissing as not immediately appealable their appeal of the probate court’s order adding a party after the conclusion of Dorn’s case-in-chief. Appellants contend the probate court’s order, which added Abbie llene Dorn (Abbie) as a party to Dorn’s petition to remove Abbie’s parents, Paul S. Cohen, M.D. and Susan Cohen (collectively, the Cohens), as the coconservators and cotrustees of the Abbie Dorn Special Needs Trust (the Trust), was immediately appealable because it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Hood v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Morrow v. Fundamental Long-Term Care Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  4. Johnson v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dorn v. CohenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API