Legal Opinion

Grant v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 21, 2007No. AC 27253PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Robert Grant, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court (1) abused its discretion by failing to grant certification to appeal and (2) improperly concluded that his trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance. We dismiss the appeal.

The petitioner is incarcerated pursuant to his 1990 conviction for accessory to murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-8 and 53a-54a. His conviction was upheld on appeal in State v. Grant, 219 Conn. 596, 594 A.2d 459 (1991). In…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Dunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Grant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Little v. Warden, State PrisonConnecticut Superior Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API