Legal Opinion

Alabama Power Co. v. Cornelius

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1924No. 6 Div. 92PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, O. J.

The counts upon which this ease was tried, amended counts 1 and 3, were in trespass, and the things complained of and damages claimed constituted a single and continuous trespass and injuries proximately resulting therefrom and were not subject to the defendant’s demurrer. The cases relied upon by appellant’s counsel are unlike this one. The case of Sudduth v. Central of Georgia R. R., 197 Ala. 393, 73 South. 28, involved a complaint which charged in the same count trespass and case; that is, trespass in entering arid laying the tract and an independent wrong as to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. East Birmingham Realty Co. v. Birmingham Machine & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Williams v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Snedecor v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Hill v. HoukSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Vulcan Materials Company v. GraceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Biglane v. RawlesMississippi Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API