Legal Opinion

Yost v. Eugene I. Rosenfeld & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1918Published

Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Dupuy, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The cause was heard before Boy», O. 3\, Briscoe, Burke, Pattison, TJrner, Stockbridgke and Constable, JJ.

1Opinion of the Court

Pattison, L,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff filed the bill in this case for the purpose of vacating and annulling a deed executed by the defendant, Gladys D. Yost, to one Eleanor M. Yost.

The deed is dated April 5th, 1915, and was duly recorded among the Land Records of Baltimore City. By it certain property on Bonner road and Garrison avenue, in the City of Baltimore, is conveyed to the grantee by the grantor, named in the deed.

At the time of the conveyance of this property and sometime prior thereto, it is alleged, that the defendant, Gladys D. Yost, the owner of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Rohr v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  3. Diggs v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Susquehanna Fertilizer Co. v. Thomas H. White & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  5. Dawson v. WaltemeyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API