Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Utilities District v. Balka

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1997No. S-95-588PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sprague, D J.

Plaintiff-appellant Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha (MUD) filed a claim seeking a $159,931.21 refund of Nebraska retail sales tax paid on electricity MUD purchased between October 1,1991, and September 30, 1992, to use in its business. The Tax Commissioner (Commissioner) approved $14,426.92 of the requested refund, but denied the remainder of the claim because MUD’s use of electricity to transport treated water from two treatment facilities into storage did not constitute “manufacturing” or “processing” under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-2704.13 (Cum. Supp. 1992), and therefore,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Omaha Public Power District v. Nebraska Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Van Ackeren v. NEBRASKA BOARD OF PAROLENebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. McCaul v. American Savings Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. PSB Credit Services, Inc. v. RichNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Nebraska State Bar Foundation v. Lancaster County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Elkhorn v. HaneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Brown v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Loup City Public Schools v. Nebraska Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. A & D Technical Supply Co. v. Nebraska Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bank of Papillion v. Ky Thi NguyenNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API