Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Hall

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is conceded that the action was brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, and that in such cases it has been held by the Supreme Court of the United States, and by this court, that the work of repairing the roadbed and bridges of a railroad after they have become instruments of interstate commerce, and maintaining them in proper condition for the passage of interstate trains, is within the Federal statute. Pedersen v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 229 H. S. 146; Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Behrens, 233 U. S. 473; Southern Pacific Company v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. E. L. Bruce Co. v. YaxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Long v. BiddleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. HarvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Sailor v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API