Legal Opinion
City of Atlanta v. Yusen Air & Sea Service Holdings, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 5, 2003No. A03A1230PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Presiding Judge.
Citing OCGA § 32-3-1 et seq., the City of Atlanta (“the City”) petitioned to condemn property owned by Yusen Air & Sea Service Holdings, Inc. and occupied by Yusen Air & Sea Service (USA), Inc. (collectively, ‘Yusen”). The trial court granted the petition and condemned the property. Yusen subsequently moved to set aside the taking under OCGA § 32-3-11. The trial court granted Yusen’s motion, and the City appeals. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
1. A trial court may set aside, vacate, or annul a declaration of taking under OCGA § 32-3-11 “in the following situations…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Precise v. City of RossvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Department of Transportation v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Dorsey v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Allen v. Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Habersham Downs Homeowners' Ass'n v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metzger v. Americredit Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Antoskow & Associates, LLC v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Georgia 400 Industrial Park, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Fincher Road Investments, Lllp v. City of CantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Edgewater Hall Enterprises, LLC v. City of CantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.