Legal Opinion
Native Village of Quinhagak v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 1, 1994No. 93-35496PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
The Native Villages of Quinhagak and Goodnews Bay and others appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction in their action brought under Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 3117(a), challenging state regulations that prohibit subsistence rainbow trout fishing and federal regulations that exclude Alaska’s navigable waters from the regulation of “public lands.” We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Appellants Quinhagak Village, Goodnews Bay Village, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Cappaert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Angoon v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Totemoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Ninilchik Traditional Council Jack Kvasnikoff, Jr. v. United States of America Bruce BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Alaska Wilderness Recreation And Tourism Association v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Katie John v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Native Village Of Quinhagak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.