Barnhart v. City of Grand Rapids
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
The city commission of the defendant city on May 18, 1925, adopted a resolution declaring that the widening of Division avenue from Monroe avenue to Wealthy street by taking 12 feet from the property on the east side of the avenue and the improving of the street when so widened by paving, etc., was “a necessary public improvement.” The resolution further provided that the expense of such improvement be first met by issuing bonds of the city therefor, and that such expense—
“aside from that portion thereof required by charter or franchise to be paid by the city at large or some public service…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Commissioners of Parks & Boulevards v. MoestaMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Whitney v. Common Council of HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Rapids v. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- In re Open & Widen Willis AvenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Sault Ste. Marie City Commission v. Sault Ste. Marie City AttorneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Burleson County v. GiesenschlagCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.