Legal Opinion
Family Planning Associates Medical Group, Inc. v. Belshé
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1998No. B103978PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Introduction
At issue in this appeal is whether the California Department of Health Services (the Department) properly interpreted Medi-Cal regulations when it determined that Family Planning Associates Medical Group, Inc. (the Medical Group) was not entitled to be reimbursed separately for a component of an abortion procedure known as “dilation and extraction.” In a postpayment audit of the cost reports for two of the Medical Group’s clinics, the Department interpreted the Medi-Cal regulations to disallow as a separate cost item the office visit held two days before the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Physicians & Surgeons Laboratories, Inc. v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Quintana v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Wheeler v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Cambell Industries v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Communities for a Better Environment v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hi-Desert Medical Center v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Daghlian v. Devry University, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Munroe v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Communities for a Better Environment v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.