Nunnery v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, C.J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. This appeal arises from Twila Dawn Nunnery’s conviction for neglect of her adopted daughter, Jane,1 and touching her for lustful purposes. Nunnery now appeals, arguing: (1) the trial court erred in allowing hearsay testimony in violation of her confrontation rights and right to a fair trial; (2) the trial court erred in allowing Connie Keene’s testimony regarding her interview with Jane because it was improper, prejudicial, and inflammatory; (3) the trial court erred in not allowing the testimony of Dan Smith; (4) the trial court erred in allowing Quentin Nunnery…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ross v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Rubenstein v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Eakes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Conners v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- Bennett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bryan Morton v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- James Douglas McKnight v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
- Keif Lamont Jones v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Frank Thomas Friday v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- Anthony Lafayette v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.