Legal Opinion

Nahmias v. Merchants Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to declare that plaintiff is entitled to receive no-fault benefits from the defendant, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.), entered May 13, 1982, which, upon granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, inter alia, declared that plaintiff was entitled to receive “first-party no-fault personal injury protection benefits”. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The controversy between the parties was submitted to Special Term on agreed facts for a determination on the law. On April 23, 1976, defendant’s insured…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Mandarino v. Travelers Property Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Keith v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Unigard Insurance Group v. BothwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Hanover Insurance v. FleisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API