Legal Opinion
Rojas v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 19, 2008No. 07-CV-6250 CJSPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CHARLES. J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action alleging “hostile environment” employment discrimination on the basis of sex, and retaliation, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title ‘VII”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the New York Human Rights Law (“NYHRL”), Executive Law § 290 et seq., as well as state common-law claims for assault and battery. Now before the Court are Defendants’ motions [# 5][# 16] to dismiss the Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the reasons…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rojas v. Roman Catholic Diocese of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Fratello v. Archdiocese of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Parra v. City of White PlainsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Redhead v. Conference of Seventh-Day AdventistsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Rojas v. Roman Catholic Diocese of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.