Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1925No. 16712PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

Before an alleged affidavit can become the basis of a legal proceeding it must appear that an oath was actually administered to the affiant or that something' was done by the *520affiant “signifying that he consciously takes upon himself the obligation of an oath.” Britt v. Davis, 130 Ga. 77 (60 S. E. 180). The affiant swore: “I was not sworn by the justice of the peace, and I did not swear to the affidavit in the warrant which you hand me, against Joe Jackson. The paper was written by the justice of the peace, and he handed it to me and I signed it. I did not swear that the defendant committed…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scroggins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Creswill v. Grand Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Britt v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Bertha Mineral Co. v. BuieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Atlanta Savings Bank v. DowningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Segars v. CornwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Williford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. JC PENNEY COMPANY v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Buice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Cone v. Sing Motor Implement, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API