Legal Opinion

The E. W. Sinclair

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided July 11, 1924No. 1787PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALL, District Judge.

The libel in this ease seeks to recover a penalty of $1,000 by reason, as alleged, that one Kan Tack, a Chinaman, was employed on board the vessel E. W. Sinclair; that the master negligently failed to detain said alien on board said vessel, and did permit the alien to leave the vessel at the port of Jacksonville, Fla.; that the vessel “arrived in the United States from a foreign port, and was notified by immigration authorities in writing not to allow said Chinese alien to land in the United States, and to detain said Chinese alien on board said vessel.” Exceptions were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Young v. StumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. J. H. Winchester & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. United States v. J. H. Winchester & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API