State v. Tien Ngoc Doan
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
Petitioner State of Arkansas requests rehearing on several grounds and seeks clarification of whether this court’s decision in State v. Tien, 326 Ark. 71, 929 S.W.2d 155 (1996) (Tien I), affirmed the trial court’s decision to suppress confessions or, alternatively, dismissed the State’s appeal. As the State points out, the difference between affirmance of the trial court’s order and dismissal of the State’s appeal in this context is important in that if our decision in Tien I affirmed the trial court’s suppression order “in its entirety,” this would bar further proceedings against respondents…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. DoanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- State v. ParkmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Etherly v. EddySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001