Artizans' Bank v. Backus
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the supreme court. The facts involved in the case are stated in the opinion of Judge Davies.
1Opinion of the Court
Davies, Ch.
The defendant is sued as indoyser of a promissory note, made by one J. R. Gilmore, payable át plaintiff’s bank. The plaintiff had discounted a note for the same amount as the note in suit, made by the same parties, and which fell due November 7,1857, and was protested for nonpayment on that day. The president of the plaintiff applied to Gilmore, the maker, to take it up by a new note, and within six days thereafter, Gilmore went to the store of the defendant, and drew the note in suit, payable ninety days after date, to the order of the defendant, who then indorsed the same. When…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mills v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Hodges v. . ShulerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Wynn v. AldenNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Bank of Cooperstown v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Home Insurance Company v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1859