Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Nooter Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 11, 1974No. Nos. 74-1056, 74-1057PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McENTEE, Circuit Judge.
This diversity case is before us for the second time. Briefly, the facts are as follows. Third-party defendant Ferguson, an Ohio corporation, was general contractor, for the construction of a brewery in Merrimack, N. H. Defendant Nooter, a Missouri corporation, was subcontractor in charge of installing brewing equipment. Nooter desired to remove a ten-foot long “I” beam from the partially completed building. To do so, it used a crane owned by Ferguson and operated by two Ferguson employees. At the time, plaintiff Wilson, also a Ferguson employee, was standing on a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stevens v. United Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
- Alfred Wilson v. Nooter Corporation, and Third-Party v. The H. K. Ferguson Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Pittsfield Cottonwear Manufacturing Co. v. Pittsfield Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
- Thomas v. HarringtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
- Carr v. Merrimack Farmers Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adam G. Nunez v. The Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Ottati & Goss, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985
- Phinney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Alfred Wilson v. Nooter Corporation, and Third Party v. The H. K. Ferguson Company, Third Party Alfred Wilson v. Nooter Corporation, and Third Party v. The H. K. Ferguson Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Phinney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994