Legal Opinion

O'Toole v. Meysenburg

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1918No. Nos. 4875, 4879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Cross-Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas; Jacob Trieber, Judge. Suit by Robert L. Meysenburg and another against Joseph P. O’Toole and others. From decree of foreclosure, both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

From a decree in foreclosure of deed of trust cross-appeals are here. • The dispute is entirely concerned with the amount allowed by the decree. The appellants (defendants) claim that it should be materially reduced because of the inclusion of usurious items, and also because a credit should have been allowed for a sum realized in another foreclosure upon other land. The plaintiffs claim the decree should be augmented by the amount of a commission ($1,100) which was deducted by the court as usurious. The court excluded several items as usurious and gave judgment for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  4. Andrews v. PondSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Coghlan v. South Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cronkleton v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. In Re Minnesota Kicks, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
  3. Anderson v. BeadleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API