Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Smith

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided October 19, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the United States Court for the Western District. Chas. W. Raymond, Judge. Action by Silas Smith against.George M. Griffin and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. The plaintiff (appellee) filed his bill in this case on November 1, 1901, alleging, in substance, that on March 23, 1901, he had old certain real estate in Okmulgee, Ind.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the United States Court for the Western District. Chas. W. Raymond, Judge. Action by Silas Smith against.George M. Griffin and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. The plaintiff (appellee) filed his bill in this case on November 1, 1901, alleging, in substance, that on March 23, 1901, he had old certain real estate in Okmulgee, Ind. Ter., described as the “Capitol Hotel Property,” to defendants (appellants) for $2,500 of which it was agreed $1,800 was to be paid in cash, and the remaining $700 evidenced by a promissory note of G. M. and H. W. Griffin, due in six…

1Opinion of the CourtClaytoN, J.

The only questions raised in this case are: First, that the exceptions to the master’s report, wherein he *93found the fact to be that the consideration to be paid as the purchase price of the premises sold under the contract was $2,500, as claimed by the plaintiff, appellee, instead of $2,000, as claimed by defendants, should have been overruled, instead of confirmed, as was done by the court; and, second ,that the decree foreclosing the lien for the balance due on the purchase price of the premises failed to provide a day within which the judgment might be satisfied, and, in default of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API