Legal Opinion
Bennett v. American Nat. Bank of Enid
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 24, 1928No. 17449PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
In order that the questions pre sented by this appeal may be fully understood, the material facts are here given in the order in which they occurred.
The defendants were engaged in the general brokerage and commission business wiith their principal office in the city of Chicago, Ill., where each of them lived. They maintained a branch office in Enid, Okla., in charge of one Livingston.
On August 20, 1924, defendants, by Livingston, presented to plaintiff a cheek for $650 drawn on the Bank of Ingersoll, of Ingersoll, Okla., by J. W. Proffitt, payable to defendants, and in exchange…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First National Bank v. Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Pinkney v. Kanawha Valley BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Whitehead v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Commercial Bank v. Red River Valley National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SicklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Shobe v. SykesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- State v. Oklahoma Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. EakinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929