Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Cowen

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1977No. Civ. A. 73-2876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.

I

Introduction

Plaintiff, a retired male railroad employee, claims that a former provision of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 228b(a) (hereafter § 228b(a))1 violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment and is invalid on the ground that it was superseded by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. § 228b(a) permitted women with thirty years’ service to retire at age sixty with full benefits; however, men with thirty years’ service receive reduced benefits if they retired between their sixtieth and sixty-fifth birthdays.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Legality of Funding the Wider Opportunities for Women Program in the Metropolitan Washington Area, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1978
  2. Lewis v. CowenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API