Lewis v. Cowen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.
I
Introduction
Plaintiff, a retired male railroad employee, claims that a former provision of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 228b(a) (hereafter § 228b(a))1 violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment and is invalid on the ground that it was superseded by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. § 228b(a) permitted women with thirty years’ service to retire at age sixty with full benefits; however, men with thirty years’ service receive reduced benefits if they retired between their sixtieth and sixty-fifth birthdays.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Legality of Funding the Wider Opportunities for Women Program in the Metropolitan Washington Area, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1978
- Lewis v. CowenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977