Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Jackson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 2012No. 2011-KA-1280Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBagneris, J.

| ^though the majority states that there was a lack of evidence to prove any illegal sexual conduct between the defendant and the victim in May 2009, it acknowledges that the State is not required to present evidence proving the date of an offense when it is not an essential element of the crime. State v. S.L.D, 08-549, pp. 7-8 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/5/08), 997 So.2d 759, 765-766. In the instant matter, the victim testified that she had sex with the defendant on multiple occasions and Detective Sentino testified that the victim was with the defendant on May 10, 2009. I find this sufficient to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. S.L.D.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API