Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DeCosta

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 2018No. 3317 EDA 2016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY BENDER, P.J.E.:

Appellant, Dondi DeCosta, appeals from the judgment of sentence of an aggregate term of 4-10 years' incarceration, imposed following his conviction for possession of an instrument of crime and terroristic threats. Appellant claims the trial court abused its discretion by permitting the jury to convict Appellant in absentia while Appellant was hospitalized and intubated, which occurred during the course of the jury's deliberations. After careful review, we vacate Appellant's judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.

A detailed recitation of the facts underlying…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Commonwealth v. FlorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. BallardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Com. v. Gregorio, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. Com. v. Herring, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Com. v. Heyboer, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Com. v. Johnson, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Com. v. McQuaid, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API