Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Cutts v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1989No. A89A0281Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcMurray, Presiding Judge

I concur in Division 3 of the majority opinion, and all that is said therein, and the reversal of the grant of judgment notwithstanding the mistrial in favor of defendants Daly and Russell. However, I respectfully dissent to Division 1 as it is my view that Grady failed to carry its burden of proving the defense of charitable immunity.

*520“It has long been the rule in Georgia that ‘an incorporated hospital, primarily maintained as a charitable institution, is not liable for the negligence of its officers and employees, unless it fails to exercise ordinary care in the selection of competent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morton v. Savannah HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Findley v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Ponder v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. Williamson, Inman & Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Patterson v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API