Legal Opinion

McKnight v. CONSOLIDATED CONCRETE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 28, 1966No. 6 Div. 121PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case.

Certiorari was granted on petition of Madeline McKnight to review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County-denying compensation for the death of her husband, Neal McKnight, in an action brought by her on behalf of herself and her minor child against Consolidated Concrete Company, Inc., a corporation, under the Alabama Workmen’s Compensation Law. § 297, Title 26, Code 1940.

The trial court found, among other things, that Madeline McKnight was the wife of Neal McKnight and that they had one child, Darol Dwang McKnight, a minor;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Locke v. LockeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Socha v. Cudahy Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Deaton Truck Line, Inc. v. AckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Kewish v. Alabama Home Builders Self Insurers FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Roberts v. Beaulieu of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
  5. Farrior v. Sodexho, U.S.A.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API