Legal Opinion

RUSSO v. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 2020No. 2:18-cv-03024Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANK C. RUSSO, et al. : MDL 875 : v. : : AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC., et al. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-3024 MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS J. RUETER August 5, 2020 United States Magistrate Judge Presently before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant Curtiss- Wright Corporation’s Tendering of a Corporate Representative for a Deposition Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) and for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence and Various Other Discovery Violations (Doc. 303) (the “Motion”), defendant Curtiss-Wright…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API