Legal Opinion

Hadden. v. Rowe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1935No. 24950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The petition, including the attached exhibits, is quite lengthy. Briefly stated, it pleads that on April 2, 1929, the firm of Otis & Company, as syndicate managers of a syndicate, sent letters to certain of their clientele informing them that they, as managers, were forming a syndicate to deal in shares of companies engaged in the steel industry, the syndicate to become effective as soon as a certain aggregate amount of subscriptions should be received and accepted by the syndicate. Each participant, in his proper proportion, was to share in the profits or proceeds of the syndicate and was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Serv. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H. S. Leyman Co. v. Piggly-Wiggly Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Dwyer v. Wiley Hotel Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API