Hazel Smith v. Howard Industries, Inc.

IRVING, P.J., FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. Hazel Smith appeals the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission (Commission), asserting that two of its findings are unsupported by substantial evidence: (1) that Smith was capable of performing the substantial acts of her usual employment; and (2) that Smith was not permanently and totally disabled, but rather only suffered a partial, fifty percent loss of industrial use to her right upper extremity. We find that the Commission's decision is supported by substantial evidence; therefore, we affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2. At the time of the events giving rise to…