Legal Opinion

Clifford Hindman Real Estate, Inc. v. City of Jennings

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2009No. ED 91472PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH M. ROMINES, Judge.

Introduction

Appellant Clifford Hindman Real Estate appeals the denial of its request for declaratory judgment after the trial court found Appellant had no standing to challenge the validity of a local ordinance because the controversy was not ripe. Because we agree that the facts were sufficiently developed and the controversy sufficiently concrete to allow the court to rule, we reverse. Additionally, because the trial court gratuitously ruled on the merits after finding no standing, we review this determination as well and hold the ordinance invalid because the city…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Missouri Health Care Ass'n v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Farmer v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Tietjens v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Ferguson Police Officers Ass'n v. City of FergusonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Associated Aviation UnderwritersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. St. Louis Ass'n of Realtors v. City of FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Mercy Hospitals East Communities v. Missouri Health Facilities Review CommitteeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. City of Kansas City v. CarlsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Engelage v. City of WarrentonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API