Legal Opinion
United States v. Isaacs
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 28, 1972No. 71 Cr. 1086PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge (Sitting by Designation).
Defendant Kerner has subpoenaed “[a] 11 contents of a locked file cabinet” of defendant Miller which the latter turned over to the Government pursuant to an immunity agreement between himself and the Government. The Government promptly filed a motion to quash the subpoena on the grounds that (1) the subpoena is overly broad and fails to establish evidentiary relevance and (2) some of the documents contained therein are immune from subpoena pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3500(a).. See Rule 17(c), F.R.Cr.P.
At the pre-trial conference…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. Stinnett,et alCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- Dunlap v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada v. Henderson (In re White)District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
- Dunlap v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991