Legal Opinion

Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Alfred Joseph Munoz

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2017No. 16-0645Separate

1Opinion of the Court

FILED November 9, 2017 Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Munoz, 16-0645 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS LOUGHRY, Chief Justice, dissenting: OF WEST VIRGINIA The majority correctly concludes that the respondent committed all of the professional misconduct specified in the Statement of Charges, including lying to a magistrate in his DUI case and dilatory behavior with regard to two clients in habeas corpus proceedings. Yet, when choosing what sanction to impose, the majority overlooks the most egregious aspect of this lawyer disciplinary case: the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Office of Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. TattersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Heidi M. Georgi SturmWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API