Legal Opinion

Showalter v. Westoak Realty & Investment, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1987No. 53031PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal after the trial court sustained defendant’s motion to dismiss their second amended petition on the grounds that plaintiffs’ cause of action in fraud was barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs’ second amended petition alleged in one count at least two alternative claims: one for breach of contract and one for fraud in contract, both claims arising out of a settlement agreement, in lieu of foreclosure on real estate, entered into by the parties on September 23, 1980.

A short statement of the history of the case is necessary for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage District of Holt CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Stix & Co. v. First Missouri Bank & Trust Co. of Creve CoeurMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Berra v. Papin Builders, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Hawkins v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Link v. IseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Stephens v. HensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API