Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 13, 1936No. 425, 426PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent, a Virginia corporation, is a manufacturer of men’s clothing with its principal office and its factory in Richmond, Va. Practically all the raw materials used are brought from other states into Virginia, where respondent manufactures them into men’s clothing. About 83 per cent, of the manufactured products are sold f. o. b. Richmond, to customers located in states other than Virginia.

Two sets of charges were filed with petitioner’s local regional director by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, a labor union of workers in the men’s clothing industry, in which it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  2. Pratt v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Clover Fork Coal Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. Clark v. Lindemann & Hoverson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API