Legal Opinion

Healy v. First National Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1939No. 7,873PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This action was by agreement tried to the court without a jury. The court found for defendant, and plaintiff appealed from the judgment.

The complaint sets forth that plaintiff, a customer of defendant bank, on April 15, 1935, negotiated a loan from defendant in the sum of $1,400, the same to be placed to his credit in his account with the defendant bank; that he gave a note to defendant in that amount and deposited as security 200 shares of the capital stock of the Consolidated Oil Company, and agreed to deposit 200 additional shares of the same company which plaintiff was purchasing; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. FitzpatrickMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Lewis v. AronowMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Murphy v. La ChapelleMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Parham v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Matter of MoyerMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In re M.F.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Notti v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. O'Sullivan v. SimpsonMontana Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API